D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by dannybee » Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:48 pm

just a thought here could be that you have too much sensitizer in the mix, try backing it down until it doesn't crosslink every thing :D

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by vasimv » Sat Aug 24, 2019 3:38 pm

dannybee wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:41 pm I have worked with pva in both silver and dichromate , its sounds like the speed ball (DIAZO sensitizer) is acting like a crosslinker, I've wanted to try this too, if it is a crosslinker in your pva you should see a weak image shortly after exposer with no processing (just like dcgpva) you could also include a dye with a electronic doner (tea) , then use fix just as in dcg and process just like a dcg. and if it works like this in pva then it will work in gel too...
If i remember correctly, reflection images appears only after water bath, i guess it does like photoresists that used for PCBs making. I don't see a way to process it is like DCG, exposed layer seems to be fully water resistant. I'll try to do some experiments with dye later, thanks for idea.
dannybee wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:41 pm it also depends on the grade of pva you are using, also to get a good attachment to glass use a 1% pva with very little dichromate to coat the glass then let it dry in the sun
http://www.signindustry.com/screen/arti ... lsion.php3
Well, i had no problem with attaching it to glass, just poured some and used mayer bar. Biggest problem is the emulsion solution is low viscosity and needed to be dryed at very good levelled surface to get uniform thickness.

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by dannybee » Sat Aug 24, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by dannybee » Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:41 pm

I have worked with pva in both silver and dichromate , its sounds like the speed ball (DIAZO sensitizer) is acting like a crosslinker, I've wanted to try this too, if it is a crosslinker in your pva you should see a weak image shortly after exposer with no processing (just like dcgpva) you could also include a dye with a electronic doner (tea) , then use fix just as in dcg and process just like a dcg. and if it works like this in pva then it will work in gel too... it also depends on the grade of pva you are using, also to get a good attachment to glass use a 1% pva with very little dichromate to coat the glass then let it dry in the sun
http://www.signindustry.com/screen/arti ... lsion.php3

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by Martin » Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:40 am

vasimv wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2019 12:48 pm
Yes, exposed areas are water resistant, unexposed ones get washed off, like photoresist. IPA baths are useless, it has no effect.
OK. So in order to record reflection holograms (and apply DCG-like processing) you'd have to pre-harden/crosslink the PVA prior to the holographic exposure. But using gelatin instead of PVA might be much easier...
vasimv wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2019 12:48 pm I just did keep in water for few minutes and then used heat gun to remove water from surface for 20-30 seconds.
Most likely this will destroy the holographic *fringes".

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by vasimv » Wed Aug 21, 2019 12:48 pm

Martin wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:42 am Sounds pretty interesting.
So did I get it right, your PVA + Speedball layer becomes water resistent after the holographic exposure?
If so, you might process the layer à la DCG - water bath + IPA dehydration.
For bleaching you might try potassium permanganate. It worked nicely with D.A.S. gelatin.
Yes, exposed areas are water resistant, unexposed ones get washed off, like photoresist. IPA baths are useless, it has no effect. I just did keep in water for few minutes and then used heat gun to remove water from surface for 20-30 seconds. Easy to process but will create problem for bleaching as the agent won't get into emulsion. I guess, i need to reduce speedball diazo sensitizer's amount further.

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by Martin » Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:42 am

vasimv wrote: Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:31 am After reducing amount of sensitizer i've obtained some weak diffraction patterns from PVA + speedball sensitizer with transmission hologram copy, but it is really bad quality - i barely see some edges of shiny objects. Looks promising still (i like its simple developing process - just few minutes in water) but need to find a way to bleach the emulsion after developing in water as it blocks light and suitable only for amplitude holograms. Later i'll try it with gelatine too.

Sounds pretty interesting.
So did I get it right, your PVA + Speedball layer becomes water resistent after the holographic exposure?
If so, you might process the layer à la DCG - water bath + IPA dehydration.
For bleaching you might try potassium permanganate. It worked nicely with D.A.S. gelatin.

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by vasimv » Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:31 am

After reducing amount of sensitizer i've obtained some weak diffraction patterns from PVA + speedball sensitizer with transmission hologram copy, but it is really bad quality - i barely see some edges of shiny objects. Looks promising still (i like its simple developing process - just few minutes in water) but need to find a way to bleach the emulsion after developing in water as it blocks light and suitable only for amplitude holograms. Later i'll try it with gelatine too.

My recipe: 50ml of ~6% PVA solution + about 1.5 ml of speedball sensitizer solution, 405nm laser and transmission hologram on litiholo film (removed from glass). Viscosity of my PVA solution is quite low and coating with mayer bar didn't make good layer as i didn't have good levelled surface to dry. Will try to evoporate some water from PVA solution to get suitable viscosity.

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by Martin » Fri Jul 12, 2019 10:11 am

vasimv wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:13 am perhaps i should try again with smaller concetration of the sensitizer and with transmission copy.
Yes, that would be interesting.
The speed was ok, comparable with my FEG experiments (with 405nm laser). It's a bit confusing as was supposed to be used with monomer (vinyl acetate in the emulsion can) but works without too. May be that was because PVA didn't get fully polymerized (not fully dried perhaps) and got washed off by water in non-exposed areas.
It looks like some diazos can actually crosslink colloids like PVA, gelatin etc. very much like dichromates. The D.A.S. I mentioned earlier acted like that. But it was difficult to get a sufficient amount of D.A.S. into the gelatin. That's why 405nm absorption was pretty weak and hence speed was lower than for FEG or DCG. But maybe the Speedball thing is better in that respect...

Re: D.I.Y. holographic photopolymer

by vasimv » Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:13 am

Martin wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:58 am So you did try PVA (PVOH) + "Speedball diazo sensitizer, right? And, if I'm not misled, "Speedball diazo sensitizer" consists of the diazo stuff only (in form of a powder I assume), correct? In other words, this stuff is not identical with the "Speedball emulsion" (which is a liquid based on vinyl acetate + diazo), right?

If that's the case, you're dealing with a DIAZO but not with a photopolymer system. That said, it sounds interesting - particularly if speed is OK and holograms can be recorded. You might try to contact copy a transmission grating to see if resolution is fit for holography. You then could try gelatin instead of PVA...
Yep, just polivinyl alcohol (well, at least it says so on bag with it, 98% or so). The speedball stuff comes in two cans - speedball emulsion (listed with vinyl acetate in MSDS, about 700 ml) and the sensitizer bottle (there is about 2g concetrated sensitizer which i've dissolved in water as in instruction), i've used just the sensitizer to sensitize the polivinyl alcohol solution. The layer was quite thin but very foggy (seems very concetrated dye/particles or something) and blocked much of light. No holographic stuff (tried to do reflection one) but i've got coins reflections and pva-free areas in shadows. I did that few weeks ago, perhaps i should try again with smaller concetration of the sensitizer and with transmission copy.

The speed was ok, comparable with my FEG experiments (with 405nm laser). It's a bit confusing as was supposed to be used with monomer (vinyl acetate in the emulsion can) but works without too. May be that was because PVA didn't get fully polymerized (not fully dried perhaps) and got washed off by water in non-exposed areas.

Top