Holographyforum.org / holowiki.org

John, I hope you're not quitting holography. You've been a great inspirer.

Dinesh, you once mentioned that science and art are two completely different things, not to be reconciled or mixed. That is certainly true. Yet, several scientists speak of the beauty or elegance of scientific theories and give this as a reason for working on a certain theory or mathematical expres...

Thanks for the info, Jeffrey.

Bob, I am also interested in this. A few years ago I heard about the forthcoming Bayer/Ultimate film, and then I heard nothing after that. Did they come up with a material?

Just to clarify. But, that still doesn't explain why the output light is p and not s, which it can be. No, in this optical setup the beam exiting the mirror can never be s-polarized with respect to the mirror. If it were s, then the beam would be horizontally polarised. Yes, but the beam is not s-po...

The beam going along the positive y axis ("up") has the y-z plane as the plane of incidence while the polarisation vector is along the x axis, and so the beam as shown is s polarised. Yes, the beam going up towards the mirror is s-polarized in relation to the cube. But it is p-polarized i...

Yes, that was inspiring, on several levels.

Dave,

Do you have any more µBLue you want to sell?

It was first listed at $200,000. With a $550 shipping ...

That mirror is small compared to this monster: http://www.ebay.com/itm/130595551977

I wonder if it was a forum member who bought it ...