Search found 794 matches

by Joe Farina
Tue May 23, 2023 6:39 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

After some more tests this morning, I think the reason for the slightly yellower appearance of the one sample (non-de-aired) is simply because it's volume looks darker, due to the presence of more air/bubbles scattering more light. This would seem to be confirmed by the apparent increase in total in...
by Joe Farina
Mon May 22, 2023 2:22 pm
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

Not clearly visible in the photo, but the beam going through the lower (non-de-aired) sample had a blue-green appearance, unlike the upper de-aired sample, where the beam appeared more colorless. P1010071.JPG Edit: After more tests later this day, this effect should be probably ignored, because I fo...
by Joe Farina
Mon May 22, 2023 2:19 pm
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

Thanks Din for your helpful comments. Today I did another test of de-aired vs. non-de-aired gelatin. This is 280 bloom Gelita photographic gelatin (6 grams gelatin + 47ml water). One test was de-aired at 26 inches mercury, the other one was agitated w/magnetic stirring to introduce bubbles (although...
by Joe Farina
Mon May 22, 2023 7:17 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

Just a note about gelatin gelling and drying. After a few days in the fridge, the gelatin (no dichromate) dried, and became like a hard plastic, almost like acrylic. Didn't realize how hard it gets. Also, it shrinks enormously, compared to the gel state. The photo below shows the same gelled cubes I...
by Joe Farina
Tue May 16, 2023 7:48 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: "dry" methods of increasing sensitivity without more exposure
Replies: 0
Views: 20161

"dry" methods of increasing sensitivity without more exposure

From prior discussions on the forum, I've gathered that increasing exposure is not the best way to produce better DCG holograms. Besides increased risk of object movement, laser instability, etc., there are other factors. One thing which Din had pointed out was that DCG does not have an exposure thr...
by Joe Farina
Mon May 15, 2023 5:47 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

Thanks Martin. I've printed a copy of that paper, and will be taking a closer look. Once, I did a test using a hot-dried DCG plate. The gelatin never got the chance to gel (which was intentional). It produced a weak hologram, so I didn't pursue it further. I have an old paper which talks about hot-d...
by Joe Farina
Sun May 14, 2023 2:22 pm
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

Thank you, Din, I'm grateful for your help. The method you illustrated would be a precise way of determining scattering, I will keep it in mind. Since the silicone molds produce cubes of the same size, I was also thinking of measuring the simple transmittance of different cubes of gelatin. I'll have...
by Joe Farina
Sat May 13, 2023 11:13 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

Re: gelatin tests

P1010022.JPG
P1010022.JPG (43.26 KiB) Viewed 5960 times
by Joe Farina
Sat May 13, 2023 11:11 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: gelatin tests
Replies: 16
Views: 13768

gelatin tests

Did two tests regarding noise (scattering) in gelatin. The first one was to compare possible noise due to lower-temperature heating of the mixed emulsion (40C for 30 minutes) as opposed to 50C for 2 hours. I used silicone cube molds (for making candy, available on Amazon). The gelatin was pure, with...
by Joe Farina
Sat May 06, 2023 7:36 am
Forum: DCG
Topic: Diazo (Speedball) gelatin hologram
Replies: 33
Views: 208016

Re: Diazo (Speedball) gelatin hologram

The first thing that occurred to me was the size of the reproduction source. But, you say you can get sharp holograms with silver, so this does not appear to be the problem. Joy asked if you used the same source, at the same distance, for the sharp hologram as the blurred ones. I forgot to reply to...