Short time reference beam

Holography related topics.
John Klayer
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 2:28 am

Short time reference beam

Post by John Klayer »

I was shooting a set of cave holograms a while back using two fibers - one for the reference and one for illumination. During one shot the reference fiber fell out of its holder sometime during the exposure. So I don't know how much shorter than the object exposure the reference exposure was but that image turned out the best by far of the set. Just seems strange. I tried a little bit to duplicate the result in the lab without much success, I might try it again some day.
Steven
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:14 pm
Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Short time reference beam

Post by Steven »

Maybe the bright hologram was the result of having a better beam ratio?

Steven.
Success through failure - the amateur DCG holographer's path to enlightenment.
John Klayer
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 2:28 am

Re: Short time reference beam

Post by John Klayer »

Yeah, I thought that too but wouldn't the extra object light without the accompanying reference beam have just added noise to degrade the image, not improve it?
Ed Wesly
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 2:16 pm

Re: Short time reference beam

Post by Ed Wesly »

Depends on whether or not the object light alone was under the exposure threshold of the material. It could also be that this one was properly exposed, the other less bright ones were overdone.
"We're the flowers in the dustbin" Sex Pistols
Din
Posts: 402
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:47 pm

Re: Short time reference beam

Post by Din »

John Klayer wrote:Yeah, I thought that too but wouldn't the extra object light without the accompanying reference beam have just added noise to degrade the image, not improve it?
Not necessarily.

Consider the reason for the noise. If you over-modulate with a higher object beam, you "flatten" the sinusoidal peaks. This results in Fourier components in your grating. Some of these components are low frequency. Thus, the low frequency grating diffract at small angles and throw a halo around the object - noise. So, it very much depends on the ratio (I'm assuming you did have some reference - your statement "without the accompanying reference" seems to indicate that there was no ref), the way you develop, the angle of the ref, which presumably was not the angle you intended, since the ref fibre fell out and, also presumably, hit the floor and so hit the plate at some other angle than the one intended, among other factors. Also, was there a colour shift? It may be that the photopic at the colour of the recon is greater than that of the previous shots, thus making it seem brighter.
Post Reply